Newsfeed & Content Library

In a recent episode of the State of Tel Aviv and Beyond podcast, hosted by Vivian Bercovici, ALCCA’s Chair, Mark Sandler, joined the program for a wide-ranging discussion on the alarming level of antisemitism, public safety concerns, and the broader challenges facing civil society in Canada and other Western democracies following October 7.

A newly published paper raises concerns about the Canadian Museum for Human Rights’ proposed “Nakba” exhibit, including its development process, narrative framing, and potential impact. In this piece, we outline the key findings and recommendations, along with ways readers can engage on this issue.

ALCCA’s Chair examines a Toronto case in which a charge of public incitement of hatred against the Islamic Republic of Iran was withdrawn, raising important questions about the application of Canadian hate law and the distinction between governments and protected groups.

An Ontario Court of Justice judge has found that a theft at a Toronto protest was motivated by bias, prejudice, or hatred against the Jewish community, rejecting a discharge and emphasizing denunciation and deterrence in sentencing. The decision underscores the serious impact of hate-motivated conduct and contributes to a growing body of case law recognizing the harm of antisemitic incidents in Canada.

Access ALCCA's April 23, 2026 Newsletter.

ALCCA Chair Mark Sandler comments on expanded charges in the TMU case, including public incitement of hatred, riot-related offences, and mischief.

An examination of recent cases where criminal charges linked to antisemitic conduct and politically motivated vandalism were withdrawn, raising concerns about prosecutorial discretion, public safety, and the normalization of hate in Canada.

A Windsor court has sentenced Nicholas Amor to nearly two years in prison for inciting hatred against Jews and possessing weapons. The case underscores the real-world dangers of extremist hate speech and its impact on community safety.

A Law Society of Ontario panel has found that a lawyer’s use of an antisemitic trope – among other misconduct – contributed to the revocation of his licence. The panel rejected claims the comment was benign, recognizing it as a harmful stereotype.